Medtronic Duran AnCore versus Edwards MC3 rings for tricuspid annuloplasty | Zendy

Seok In Lee | Zendy; Ho Jin Kim | Zendy; Joon Bum Kim | Zendy; SungHo Jung | Zendy; Suk Jung Choo | Zendy; Cheol Hyun Chung | Zendy; Jae Won Lee | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Medtronic Duran AnCore versus Edwards MC3 rings for tricuspid annuloplasty

Author(s) -

Seok In Lee,

Ho Jin Kim,

Joon Bum Kim,

SungHo Jung,

Suk Jung Choo,

Cheol Hyun Chung,

Jae Won Lee

Publication year - 2017

Publication title -

interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery

Language(s) - Uncategorized

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 0.546

H-Index - 56

eISSN - 1569-9293

pISSN - 1569-9285

DOI - 10.1093/icvts/ivx005

Subject(s) - medicine , tricuspid valve , cardiology , regurgitation (circulation) , propensity score matching , surgery

Ring annuloplasty is now regarded as the standard surgical technique for the correction of tricuspid regurgitation (TR). However, comparative research on the durability of commercially available annuloplasty rings is limited. We reviewed early and late surgical results of tricuspid annuloplasty using the Duran AnCore and Edwards MC3 rings.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research