z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Participatory constitution-making: Introduction
Author(s) -
Sujit Choudhry,
Mark Tushnet
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
international journal of constitutional law
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.493
H-Index - 33
eISSN - 1474-2659
pISSN - 1474-2640
DOI - 10.1093/icon/moaa014
Subject(s) - popular sovereignty , constitution , democratization , legitimacy , political science , law , notional amount , sovereignty , politics , citizen journalism , power (physics) , sociology , law and economics , democracy , economics , physics , finance , quantum mechanics
At least since the late eighteenth century, constitutions have been understood as emanations of the will of “the People,” as the ultimate expression of an inherent popular sovereignty. In the form of theories of constituent power, accounts of constitutional foundations blended notional or conceptual “descriptions” of the People, which anchored the political legitimacy of constitutional orders in the idea of hypothetical consent, with empirical claims that the nation’s actual people were represented in constitution-making processes through elected delegates and thereby were the authors of and gave consent to its fundamental law. As part of the third wave of democratization, there was an important shift in what popular participation consisted of—from indirect participation by elected representatives to direct, popular participation in the constitution-making process. As a matter of constitutional process, this led to the growing practice, and expectation, that major constitutional changes should be ratified through referenda.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom