Assumptions behind size-based ecosystem models are realistic
Author(s) -
Ken H. Andersen,
Julia L. Blanchard,
Elizabeth A. Fulton,
Henrik Gislason,
Nis S. Jacobsen,
Tobias van Kooten
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
ices journal of marine science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.348
H-Index - 117
eISSN - 1095-9289
pISSN - 1054-3139
DOI - 10.1093/icesjms/fsv211
Subject(s) - constructive , ecosystem , stock assessment , stock (firearms) , population size , fishing , density dependence , suite , context (archaeology) , population , geography , environmental science , ecology , econometrics , computer science , mathematics , biology , demography , sociology , archaeology , process (computing) , operating system
A recent publication about balanced harvesting (Froese et al., ICES Journal of Marine Science; 73: 1640-1650) contains several erroneous statements about size-spectrum models. We refute the statements by showing that the assumptions pertaining to size-spectrum models discussed by Froese et al. are realistic and consistent. We further show that the assumption about density-dependence being described by a stock recruitment relationship is responsible for determining whether a peak in the cohort biomass of a population occurs late or early in life. Finally, we argue that there is indeed a constructive role for a wide suite of ecosystem models to evaluate fishing strategies in an ecosystem context.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom