Rebuilding depleted fisheries towards BMSY under uncertainty: harvest control rules outperform combined management measures

Rebuilding depleted fisheries towards sustainable levels, such as BMSY, is challenging under uncertainty. Although a substantial amount of research has highlighted the importance of accounting for uncertainty in fisheries management, tactical measures remain to be identified. We consider two approaches to achieve this goal: (i) the naive maximum sustainable yield (MSY) approach, combining management measures based on effort control, catch quotas, and spatial–temporal closures, and (ii) the harvest control rules (HCRs) approach, developing HCRs based on short-term or long-term targets. A suite of strategies is developed accordingly and tested with management strategy evaluation for their performance under four sources of uncertainty that may negatively impact management effects, including reduced recruitment strength, increased natural mortality, inadequate implementation error, and varying levels of temporal effort aggregation. Combining management measures using the naive MSY approach is found to perform poorly in tackling uncertainty. Complex HCRs that account for both short-term and long-term BMSY targets can mitigate the adverse effects of uncertainty. The rebuilding target can be only achieved by compromising yield, especially when uncertainties with natural mortality and recruitment are present. Strategies based on catch quotas are prone to all sources of uncertainty, indicating latent risks in many current management practices.