English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Twelve stanchion-housing dairy barns, 6 in Tompkins County and 6 in adjacent Schuyler County, New York, were selected to evaluate residual wall treatments of Ectiban for house fly control. All barns had a historyo f house fly populations warranting control during summer months. Test treatments were applied to 4 barns in each area, 1 dosageper barn, 2 applications. Two barns in each area served as checks. Aqueous coarse droplet spray treatments were applied to appropriate interior barn surfaces with a doublenozzle spray boom at 100 psi of pressure. A first series of treatments was applied in early June, and second treatments were applied in either mid-July or the first week of August (0.5% treatments, Schuyler County). Insecticidal treatments used check barns were ap-plied by respective farmers and consisted of space sprays, electric grids, and baits; these treatments were used either individually or in various combinations. House fly populations were monitored weekly by the number of fly specks deposited on 1" x 8 1/2" white paper strips.

Dairy, House Fly Control, 1977