z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Phytotoxicity of Safer’S Insecticidal Soap and Mavrik Aquaflow as a Postharvest DIP, 1990
Author(s) -
Victoria L. Tenbrink,
James D. Hansen,
A. H. Hara
Publication year - 1991
Publication title -
insecticide and acaricide tests
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 0276-3656
DOI - 10.1093/iat/16.1.261a
Subject(s) - phytotoxicity , postharvest , horticulture , safer , mathematics , biology , statistics
Phytotoxicity trials were conducted on 26 flower and foliage commodities commonly shipped from Hawaii. Twenty stems of each type were rated on visual quality by 2 observers, and the scores were combined for an overall rating score ranging from 0 (perfect) to 18 (complete necrosis). The stems were randomly divided; 10 were dipped in water for 15 min, and 10 were dipped for 15 min in a solution of Safer’s Soap at 72.4 ml (AI)/gal combined with Mavrik Aquaflow at 3.9 g (AI)/gal. The solutions were shaken off, the cut ends of the stems immersed in water, and the flowers and foliage left to dry without rinsing. They were kept at ca. 26°C and rated twice weekly for up to 3 wk. Mean rating scores for treated and controls were subjected to T test.PHYTOTOXICITY OF SAFER’S INSECTICIDAL SOAP AND MAVRIK AQUAFLOW AS A POSTHARVEST DIP, 1990: Phytotoxicity trials were conducted on 26 flower and foliage commodities commonly shipped from Hawaii. Twenty stems of each type were rated on visual quality by 2 observers, and the scores were combined for an overall rating score ranging from 0 (perfect) to 18 (complete necrosis). The stems were randomly divided; 10 were dipped in water for 15 min, and 10 were dipped for 15 min in a solution of Safer’s Soap at 72.4 ml (AI)/gal combined with Mavrik Aquaflow at 3.9 g (AI)/gal. The solutions were shaken off, the cut ends of the stems immersed in water, and the flowers and foliage left to dry without rinsing. They were kept at ca. 26°C and rated twice weekly for up to 3 wk. Mean rating scores for treated and controls were subjected to T test.PHYTOTOXICITY OF SAFER’S INSECTICIDAL SOAP AND MAVRIK AQUAFLOW AS A POSTHARVEST DIP, 1990: Phytotoxicity trials were conducted on 26 flower and foliage commodities commonly shipped from Hawaii. Twenty stems of each type were rated on visual quality by 2 observers, and the scores were combined for an overall rating score ranging from 0 (perfect) to 18 (complete necrosis). The stems were randomly divided; 10 were dipped in water for 15 min, and 10 were dipped for 15 min in a solution of Safer’s Soap at 72.4 ml (AI)/gal combined with Mavrik Aquaflow at 3.9 g (AI)/gal. The solutions were shaken off, the cut ends of the stems immersed in water, and the flowers and foliage left to dry without rinsing. They were kept at ca. 26°C and rated twice weekly for up to 3 wk. Mean rating scores for treated and controls were subjected to T test.PHYTOTOXICITY OF SAFER’S INSECTICIDAL SOAP AND MAVRIK AQUAFLOW AS A POSTHARVEST DIP, 1990: Phytotoxicity trials were conducted on 26 flower and foliage commodities commonly shipped from Hawaii. Twenty stems of each type were rated on visual quality by 2 observers, and the scores were combined for an overall rating score ranging from 0 (perfect) to 18 (complete necrosis). The stems were randomly divided; 10 were dipped in water for 15 min, and 10 were dipped for 15 min in a solution of Safer’s Soap at 72.4 ml (AI)/gal combined with Mavrik Aquaflow at 3.9 g (AI)/gal. The solutions were shaken off, the cut ends of the stems immersed in water, and the flowers and foliage left to dry without rinsing. They were kept at ca. 26°C and rated twice weekly for up to 3 wk. Mean rating scores for treated and controls were subjected to T test.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom