Immediate versus delayed insertion of an etonogestrel releasing implant at medical abortion—a randomized controlled equivalence trial | Zendy

Helena Hognert | Zendy; Helena Kopp Kallner | Zendy; Sharon Cameron | Zendy; Christiyrelli | Zendy; Izabella Jawad | Zendy; Rebecca Heller | Zendy; Annette Aronsson | Zendy; Ingela Lindh | Zendy; Lina Benson | Zendy; Kristina GemzellDanielsson | Zendy

Open Access

Immediate versus delayed insertion of an etonogestrel releasing implant at medical abortion—a randomized controlled equivalence trial

Author(s) -

Helena Hognert,

Helena Kopp Kallner,

Sharon Cameron,

Christiyrelli,

Izabella Jawad,

Rebecca Heller,

Annette Aronsson,

Ingela Lindh,

Lina Benson,

Kristina GemzellDanielsson

Publication year - 2016

Publication title -

human reproduction

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 2.446

H-Index - 226

eISSN - 1460-2350

pISSN - 0268-1161

DOI - 10.1093/humrep/dew238

Subject(s) - etonogestrel , medicine , contraceptive implant , medical abortion , desogestrel , mifepristone , obstetrics , abortion , randomized controlled trial , gynecology , unintended pregnancy , implant , pregnancy , long acting reversible contraception , population , family planning , surgery , misoprostol , research methodology , environmental health , biology , genetics

Does a progestin releasing subdermal contraceptive implant affect the efficacy of medical abortion if inserted at the same visit as the progesterone receptor modulator, mifepristone, at medical abortion?

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research