Hysteroscopic proximal tubal occlusion versus laparoscopic salpingectomy as a treatment for hydrosalpinges prior to IVF or ICSI: an RCT | Zendy

Kim Dreyer | Zendy; Marit C. I. Lier | Zendy; M.H. Emanuel | Zendy; Jos W. R. Twisk | Zendy; Ben W. Mol | Zendy; R. Schats | Zendy; Peter G.A. Hompes | Zendy; Velja Mijatovic | Zendy

Open Access

Hysteroscopic proximal tubal occlusion versus laparoscopic salpingectomy as a treatment for hydrosalpinges prior to IVF or ICSI: an RCT

Author(s) -

Kim Dreyer,

Marit C. I. Lier,

M.H. Emanuel,

Jos W. R. Twisk,

Ben W. Mol,

R. Schats,

Peter G.A. Hompes,

Velja Mijatovic

Publication year - 2016

Publication title -

human reproduction

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 2.446

H-Index - 226

eISSN - 1460-2350

pISSN - 0268-1161

DOI - 10.1093/humrep/dew050

Subject(s) - medicine , salpingectomy , randomized controlled trial , laparoscopy , hydrosalpinx , hysteroscopy , pregnancy rate , gynecology , obstetrics , pregnancy , surgery , infertility , ectopic pregnancy , genetics , biology

Does hysteroscopic proximal tubal occlusion by intratubal devices as a treatment for hydrosalpinges result in comparable ongoing pregnancy rates following IVF/ICSI when compared with laparoscopic salpingectomy?

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research