Is IVF—served two different ways—more cost-effective than IUI with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation? | Zendy

R. I. Tjon-Kon-Fat | Zendy; A. J. Bensdorp | Zendy; Patrick M. Bossuyt | Zendy; C.A.M. Koks | Zendy; G. J. E. Oosterhuis | Zendy; Annemieke Hoek | Zendy; Peter G.A. Hompes | Zendy; Frank J. Broekmans | Zendy; Harold R Verhoeve | Zendy; Jan Peter de Bruin | Zendy; R. van Golde | Zendy; Sjoerd Repping | Zendy; Ben J Cohlen | Zendy; MDA Lambers | Zendy; P. F. van Bommel | Zendy; Els Slappendel | Zendy; D A M Perquin | Zendy; J Smeenk | Zendy; M.J. Pelinck | Zendy; Judith Gianotten | Zendy; Diederik A. Hoozemans | Zendy; J W M Maas | Zendy; Henk Groen | Zendy; Marinus J.C. Eijkemans | Zendy; Fulco van der Veen | Zendy; B.W. Mol | Zendy; Madelon van Wely | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Is IVF—served two different ways—more cost-effective than IUI with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation?

Author(s) -

R. I. Tjon-Kon-Fat,

A. J. Bensdorp,

Patrick M. Bossuyt,

C.A.M. Koks,

G. J. E. Oosterhuis,

Annemieke Hoek,

Peter G.A. Hompes,

Frank J. Broekmans,

Harold R Verhoeve,

Jan Peter de Bruin,

R. van Golde,

Sjoerd Repping,

Ben J Cohlen,

MDA Lambers,

P. F. van Bommel,

Els Slappendel,

D A M Perquin,

J Smeenk,

M.J. Pelinck,

Judith Gianotten,

Diederik A. Hoozemans,

J W M Maas,

Henk Groen,

Marinus J.C. Eijkemans,

Fulco van der Veen,

B.W. Mol,

Madelon van Wely

Publication year - 2015

Publication title -

human reproduction

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 2.446

H-Index - 226

eISSN - 1460-2350

pISSN - 0268-1161

DOI - 10.1093/humrep/dev193

Subject(s) - controlled ovarian hyperstimulation , intrauterine insemination , natural cycle , gynecology , in vitro fertilisation , ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome , embryo transfer , medicine , artificial insemination , ovulation induction , insemination , single embryo transfer , obstetrics , infertility , andrology , pregnancy , biology , genetics , sperm

What is the cost-effectiveness of in vitro fertilization (IVF) with conventional ovarian stimulation, single embryo transfer (SET) and subsequent cryocycles or IVF in a modified natural cycle (MNC) compared with intrauterine insemination with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (IUI-COH) as a first-line treatment in couples with unexplained subfertility and an unfavourable prognosis on natural conception?.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research