Live birth rates after MESA or TESE in men with obstructive azoospermia: is there a difference? | Zendy

Madelon van Wely | Zendy; N. Barbey | Zendy; Andreas Meißner | Zendy; Sjoerd Repping | Zendy; S. Silber | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Live birth rates after MESA or TESE in men with obstructive azoospermia: is there a difference?

Author(s) -

Madelon van Wely,

N. Barbey,

Andreas Meißner,

Sjoerd Repping,

S. Silber

Publication year - 2015

Publication title -

human reproduction

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 2.446

H-Index - 226

eISSN - 1460-2350

pISSN - 0268-1161

DOI - 10.1093/humrep/dev032

Subject(s) - testicular sperm extraction , intracytoplasmic sperm injection , obstructive azoospermia , azoospermia , sperm retrieval , sperm , andrology , gynecology , medicine , biology , embryo , infertility , pregnancy , in vitro fertilisation , genetics , microbiology and biotechnology

How do live birth rates compare after intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) for men with obstructive azoospermia when using sperm derived from testicular sperm extraction (TESE) versus microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration (MESA)?

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research