Self-operated endovaginal telemonitoring versus traditional monitoring of ovarian stimulation in assisted reproduction: an RCT | Zendy

Jan Gerris | Zendy; Annick Delvigne | Zendy; Nathalie Dhont | Zendy; Frank Vandekerckhove | Zendy; B. Madoc | Zendy; M. Buyle | Zendy; J. Neyskens | Zendy; Ellen Deschepper | Zendy; Dirk De Bacquer | Zendy; Lore Pil | Zendy; Lieven Annemans | Zendy; Willem Verpoest | Zendy; Petra De Sutter | Zendy

Open Access

Self-operated endovaginal telemonitoring versus traditional monitoring of ovarian stimulation in assisted reproduction: an RCT

Author(s) -

Jan Gerris,

Annick Delvigne,

Nathalie Dhont,

Frank Vandekerckhove,

B. Madoc,

M. Buyle,

J. Neyskens,

Ellen Deschepper,

Dirk De Bacquer,

Lore Pil,

Lieven Annemans,

Willem Verpoest,

Petra De Sutter

Publication year - 2014

Publication title -

human reproduction

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 2.446

H-Index - 226

eISSN - 1460-2350

pISSN - 0268-1161

DOI - 10.1093/humrep/deu168

Subject(s) - medicine , randomized controlled trial , follicular phase , randomization , assisted reproductive technology , gynecology , pregnancy , infertility , surgery , biology , genetics

Does self-operated endovaginal telemonitoring (SOET) of the ovarian stimulation phase in IVF/ICSI produce similar laboratory, clinical, patient reported and health-economic results as traditional monitoring (non-SOET)?

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research