Long-term outcome in couples with unexplained subfertility and an intermediate prognosis initially randomized between expectant management and immediate treatment
Author(s) -
I Custers,
M.M.E. van Rumste,
Jan Willem van der Steeg,
Madelon van Wely,
Peter G.A. Hompes,
Patrick M. Bossuyt,
F. J. Broekmans,
C N M Renckens,
M. J. C. Eijkemans,
Thierry J.H.M. van Dessel,
Fulco van der Veen,
Ben W. Mol,
Pieternel Steures
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
human reproduction
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.446
H-Index - 226
eISSN - 1460-2350
pISSN - 0268-1161
DOI - 10.1093/humrep/der389
Subject(s) - medicine , pregnancy , gynecology , obstetrics , randomized controlled trial , confidence interval , fertility , pregnancy rate , live birth , randomization , artificial insemination , population , genetics , environmental health , biology
We recently reported that treatment with intrauterine insemination and controlled ovarian stimulation (IUI-COS) did not increase ongoing pregnancy rates compared with expectant management (EM) in couples with unexplained subfertility and intermediate prognosis of natural conception. Long-term cost-effectiveness of a policy of initial EM is unknown. We investigated whether the recommendation not to treat during the first 6 months is valid, regarding the long-term effectiveness and cumulative costs.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom