Comparison of IVF cycles reported in a voluntary ART registry with a mandatory registry in Spain | Zendy

Francisca Luceño | Zendy; José Antonio Castilla | Zendy; José Luis Gómez-Palomares | Zendy; Yolanda Cabello | Zendy; Jairo Hernández | Zendy; J. Marqueta | Zendy; Julio Herrero | Zendy; Ester Vidal | Zendy; S. Fernández-Shaw | Zendy; Buenaventura Coroleu | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Comparison of IVF cycles reported in a voluntary ART registry with a mandatory registry in Spain

Author(s) -

Francisca Luceño,

José Antonio Castilla,

José Luis Gómez-Palomares,

Yolanda Cabello,

Jairo Hernández,

J. Marqueta,

Julio Herrero,

Ester Vidal,

S. Fernández-Shaw,

Buenaventura Coroleu

Publication year - 2010

Publication title -

human reproduction

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 2.446

H-Index - 226

eISSN - 1460-2350

pISSN - 0268-1161

DOI - 10.1093/humrep/deq267

Subject(s) - observational study , turnover , register (sociolinguistics) , family medicine , demography , medicine , fertility , quality (philosophy) , environmental health , population , linguistics , philosophy , management , pathology , sociology , economics , epistemology

Monitoring assisted reproductive technology (ART) is essential to evaluate the performance of fertility treatment and its impact on birth rates. In Europe, there are two kinds of ART registers: voluntary and mandatory. The validity of register data is very important with respect to the quality of register-based observational studies. The aim of this paper is to determine the degree of agreement between voluntary and mandatory ART registers.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research