What is the most valid comparison treatment in trials of intrauterine insemination, timed or uninfluenced intercourse? A systematic review and meta-analysis of indirect evidence | Zendy

Herman K. Snick | Zendy; John A. Collins | Zendy; J.L.H. Evers | Zendy

Open Access

What is the most valid comparison treatment in trials of intrauterine insemination, timed or uninfluenced intercourse? A systematic review and meta-analysis of indirect evidence

Author(s) -

Herman K. Snick,

John A. Collins,

J.L.H. Evers

Publication year - 2008

Publication title -

human reproduction

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 2.446

H-Index - 226

eISSN - 1460-2350

pISSN - 0268-1161

DOI - 10.1093/humrep/den214

Subject(s) - medicine , gynecology , obstetrics , pregnancy , randomized controlled trial , meta analysis , insemination , fertility , pregnancy rate , artificial insemination , clinical trial , intrauterine insemination , sperm , andrology , biology , population , genetics , environmental health

Timed intercourse (TI), which is the usual control treatment in trials of intrauterine insemination (IUI), is not a typical coital activity and could impair fertility. This review summarizes the trials of IUI of male partner's prepared semen among subfertile couples according to whether the control group had TI or expectant management.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research