Practitioner reporting of birth defects in children born following assisted reproductive technology: Does it still have a role in surveillance of birth defects? | Zendy

Michèle Hansen | Zendy; Elizabeth Sullivan | Zendy; A. M. Jequier | Zendy; Paul Burton | Zendy; S. M. Junk | Zendy; John L. Yovich | Zendy; Carol Bower | Zendy

Open Access

Practitioner reporting of birth defects in children born following assisted reproductive technology: Does it still have a role in surveillance of birth defects?

Author(s) -

Michèle Hansen,

Elizabeth Sullivan,

A. M. Jequier,

Paul Burton,

S. M. Junk,

John L. Yovich,

Carol Bower

Publication year - 2006

Publication title -

human reproduction

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 2.446

H-Index - 226

eISSN - 1460-2350

pISSN - 0268-1161

DOI - 10.1093/humrep/del384

Subject(s) - medicine , obstetrics , assisted reproductive technology , live birth , pediatrics , pregnancy , biology , infertility , genetics

National assisted reproductive technology (ART) data collections that rely on practitioners' reports of birth defects have consistently reported lower proportions of children with birth defects than record linkage studies that link ART infants to birth and malformation registers.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research