z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Monitoring reproductive health in Europe--what are the best indicators of reproductive health?
Author(s) -
Albrecht Jahn
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
human reproduction
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.446
H-Index - 226
eISSN - 1460-2350
pISSN - 0268-1161
DOI - 10.1093/humrep/del172
Subject(s) - reproductive health , harm , relevance (law) , reproduction , action (physics) , health indicator , process (computing) , human reproduction , set (abstract data type) , environmental health , medicine , psychology , computer science , political science , population , biology , ecology , social psychology , physics , anatomy , quantum mechanics , law , programming language , operating system
Setting up goals to monitor if the goals are achieved and to compare health performance over time and between regions is part of modern health care. A key part in this process is to choose the right indicators. The indicators in reproductive health should be selected on the basis of relevance and validity. They should be simple and action oriented because monitoring for the sake of monitoring alone may do more harm than good. We invite comments from the readers of Human Reproduction on a set of indicators suggested by Reprostat.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom