Single versus double embryo transfer: cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a randomized clinical trial | Zendy

Audrey A.A. Fiddelers | Zendy; Aafke P.A. van Montfoort | Zendy; Carmen D. Dirksen | Zendy; John C.M. Dumoulin | Zendy; Jolande A. Land | Zendy; Gerard A.J. Dunselman | Zendy; J.Marij Janssen | Zendy; Johan L. Severens | Zendy; J.L.H. Evers | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Single versus double embryo transfer: cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a randomized clinical trial

Author(s) -

Audrey A.A. Fiddelers,

Aafke P.A. van Montfoort,

Carmen D. Dirksen,

John C.M. Dumoulin,

Jolande A. Land,

Gerard A.J. Dunselman,

J.Marij Janssen,

Johan L. Severens,

J.L.H. Evers

Publication year - 2006

Publication title -

human reproduction

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 2.446

H-Index - 226

eISSN - 1460-2350

pISSN - 0268-1161

DOI - 10.1093/humrep/del112

Subject(s) - single embryo transfer , pregnancy , embryo transfer , medicine , randomized controlled trial , gynecology , live birth , obstetrics , pregnancy rate , cost effectiveness , twin pregnancy , gestation , surgery , biology , risk analysis (engineering) , genetics

Twin pregnancies after IVF are still frequent and are considered high-risk pregnancies leading to high costs. Transferring one embryo can reduce the twin pregnancy rate. We compared cost-effectiveness of one fresh cycle elective single embryo transfer (eSET) versus one fresh cycle double embryo transfer (DET) in an unselected patient population.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research