z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
A possible role for activated protein C resistance in patients with first and second trimester pregnancy failure
Author(s) -
J. Tal,
Liliana Schliamser,
Z. Leibovitz,
G. Ohel,
Dina Attias
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
human reproduction
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.446
H-Index - 226
eISSN - 1460-2350
pISSN - 0268-1161
DOI - 10.1093/humrep/14.6.1624
Subject(s) - activated protein c resistance , pregnancy , medicine , thrombophilia , antithrombin , gastroenterology , obstetrics , loss of heterozygosity , protein s , factor v leiden , gynecology , protein c , thrombosis , biology , venous thrombosis , heparin , genetics , allele , gene
Thrombophilia was recently suggested as a possible factor in recurrent pregnancy losses. We studied prospectively 125 patients (mean age 31.4 +/- 5.6 years) with one or more first or second trimester pregnancy losses for the prevalence of activated protein C resistance (APCR). Proteins C and S antigens, antithrombin III, anticardiolipin, and lupus anti-coagulant were also evaluated. Patients with uterine malformations, hormonal abnormalities, chromosomal translocations and infectious causes were excluded. A control group of 125 women with no past fetal loss were matched with the study group. Whenever the APC-sensitivity ratio (APC-SR) was </=2.2, polymerase chain reaction for factor V mutation (Leiden) was performed. Heterozygosity for the mutation was found in 18 patients (14.4%) compared with seven heterozygous among 125 control group (5. 6%; P < 0.05). Acquired APCR (APC-SR 1.8 and Leiden negative) was revealed in seven patients (5.6%) in the study group and in three of the controls (2.4%; not significant). The rate of preclinical pregnancy losses (17/48) and second trimester miscarriages (10/48) in mutation carriers was significantly higher than in patients with no APCR (25/214) and (14/214) respectively (P < 0.001 and P < 0.01 respectively). Live birth rate was not different between the two groups. Occurrence of APCR with any kind of pregnancy loss calculated per patient, in our study group, was approximately 1/7, 1/4 and 1/5 with one, two and three or more pregnancy losses respectively. These findings suggest that assessment of APCR should be considered in a more extended evaluation of such patients.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom