Artificial insemination by husband in unexplained infertility compared with infertility associated with peritoneal endometriosis
Author(s) -
Anne Katerine Omland,
Tom Tanbo,
Per Olav Dale,
Thomas Åbyholm
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
human reproduction
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.446
H-Index - 226
eISSN - 1460-2350
pISSN - 0268-1161
DOI - 10.1093/humrep/13.9.2602
Subject(s) - endometriosis , unexplained infertility , infertility , gynecology , medicine , obstetrics , artificial insemination , etiology , pregnancy , insemination , assisted reproductive technology , prospective cohort study , pregnancy rate , female infertility , andrology , biology , sperm , genetics
There have been numerous inconclusive studies examining the differences between unexplained and peritoneal endometriosis-associated infertility. Hence, the choice of artificial reproductive technique may be difficult. This prospective study compares outcome in couples with unexplained infertility and with minimal or mild endometriosis-associated infertility, undergoing treatment with ovarian stimulation combined with artificial insemination by husband. No differences were found between the unexplained infertile and the endometriosis group as to patient characteristics, response to ovarian stimulation and semen qualities. There was a significantly higher total pregnancy rate, with more multiple gestations, in the unexplained infertile compared with the endometriosis group. The difference in outcome could reflect differences in pathogenesis and aetiology for the two groups.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom