English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The aim of this study was to determine if a low response to gonadotrophin stimulation could be considered as an indication for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). This prospective study included a total of 96 non-male infertile couples with six or fewer retrieved oocytes, who underwent 104 in-vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles between January 1996 and April 1997. They were randomly divided into two groups for fertilization, one by IVF and the other by ICSI. Groups were compared in terms of fertilization rates, fertilization failure, embryo quality, embryos transferred and reproductive outcome. ICSI provided similar fertilization rates per inseminated oocyte (77.7 versus 70.2%) and per obtained oocyte (56.5 versus 58.8%) as IVF. Furthermore, equal numbers (2.2 versus 2.5) and quality of embryos were obtained and comparable pregnancy (21.1 versus 17.3%) and implantation (14.0 versus 11.1%) rates. Neither the number of retrieved oocytes, nor patient age was relevant for the fertilization rates obtained with both techniques. The number of cases with complete fertilization failure was similar in both procedures. We conclude that the technique of fertilization is not related to the reproductive outcome of low responders, and the routine use of ICSI is not indicated.

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection as a routine indication in low responder patients