Open AccessDo professional perspectives on evidence-based smoking cessation methods align? A Delphi study among researchers and healthcare professionals
Author(s) -
Daniëlle N. Zijlstra,
Ciska Hoving,
Catherine Bolman,
Jean Muris,
Hein de Vries
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
health education research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.601
H-Index - 103
eISSN - 1465-3648
pISSN - 0268-1153
DOI - 10.1093/her/cyab022
Subject(s) - smoking cessation , delphi method , psychological intervention , viewpoints , medicine , family medicine , health professionals , perception , health care , nursing , psychology , art , statistics , mathematics , pathology , visual arts , neuroscience , economics , economic growth
The use of evidence-based smoking cessation interventions (SCIs) can significantly increase the number of successful smoking cessation attempts. To obtain an overview of the knowledge and viewpoints on the effectiveness and use of SCIs, a three-round online Delphi study was conducted among researchers and primary care professionals (PCPs). The four objectives of this study are to gain an overview of (i) the criteria important for recommending SCIs, (ii) the perceptions of both groups on the effectiveness of SCIs, (iii) the factors to consider when counseling different (high-risk) groups of smokers and (iv) the perceptions of both groups on the use of e-cigarettes as an SCI. We found a high level of agreement within groups on which smoker characteristics should be considered when recommending an SCI to smokers. We also found that PCPs display a lower degree of consensus on the effectiveness of SCIs. Both groups see a value in the use of special protocols for different (high-risk) groups of patients, but the two groups did not reach consensus on the use of e-cigarettes as a means to quit. Making an inventory of PCPs' needs regarding SCIs and their usage may provide insight into how to facilitate a better uptake in the primary care setting.