z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
A pilot study to establish a randomized trial methodology to test the efficacy of a behavioural intervention
Author(s) -
D. Tappin
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
health education research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.601
H-Index - 103
eISSN - 1465-3648
pISSN - 0268-1153
DOI - 10.1093/her/15.4.491
Subject(s) - motivational interviewing , medicine , interview , intervention (counseling) , randomized controlled trial , cotinine , test (biology) , focus group , family medicine , physical therapy , clinical psychology , nursing , psychiatry , nicotine , surgery , paleontology , marketing , political science , law , business , biology
How can pregnant women be helped to stop smoking? This was a pilot study of midwife home-based motivational interviewing. Clients were 100 consecutive self-reported smokers booking at clinics in Glasgow from March to May 1997. Smoking guidance is routinely given at booking. In addition, intervention clients received a median of four home-based motivational interviewing sessions from one specially trained midwife. All sessions (n = 171) were audio-taped and interviews (n = 49) from 13 randomly selected clients were transcribed for content analysis. Three 'experts' assessed intervention quality using a recognized rating scale. Cotinine measurement on routine blood samples confirmed self-reported smoking change from late pregnancy telephone interview. Postnatal telephone questionnaire measured client satisfaction. Focus groups of routine midwives explored acceptability, problems and disruption of normal care. Fisher exact, chi 2 and Mann-Whitney tests compared enrolment characteristics. Two-sample t-tests assessed outcome between groups. Motivational interviewing was satisfactory in more than 75% of transcribed interviews. In this pilot study, self-reported smoking at booking (100 of 100 available) corroborated by cotinine (93 of 100) compared with late pregnancy self-reports (intervention 47 of 48; control 49 of 49) and cotinine (intervention 46 of 48; control 47 of 49) showed no significant difference between groups. Tools have been developed to answer the question: 'Can proactive opportunistic home-based motivational interviewing help pregnant smokers reduce their habit?'.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom