English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Fabry disease is a lysosomal storage disease arising from deficiency of the enzyme alpha-galactosidase A. Two recombinant protein therapeutics, Fabrazyme (agalsidase beta) and Replagal (agalsidase alfa), have been approved in Europe as enzyme replacement therapies for Fabry disease. Both contain the same human enzyme, alpha-galactosidase A, but they are produced using different protein expression systems and have been approved for administration at different doses. To determine if there is recognizable biochemical basis for the different doses, we performed a comparison of the two drugs, focusing on factors that are likely to influence biological activity and availability. The two drugs have similar glycosylation, both in the type and location of the oligosaccharide structures present. Differences in glycosylation were mainly limited to the levels of sialic acid and mannose-6-phosphate present, with Fabrazyme having a higher percentage of fully sialylated oligosaccharides and a higher level of phosphorylation. The higher levels of phosphorylated oligomannose residues correlated with increased binding to mannose-6-phosphate receptors and uptake into Fabry fibroblasts in vitro. Biodistribution studies in a mouse model of Fabry disease showed similar organ uptake. Likewise, antigenicity studies using antisera from Fabry patients demonstrated that both drugs were indistinguishable in terms of antibody cross-reactivity. Based on these studies and present knowledge regarding the influence of glycosylation on protein biodistribution and cellular uptake, the two protein preparations appear to be functionally indistinguishable. Therefore, the data from these studies provide no rationale for the use of these proteins at different therapeutic doses.

A biochemical and pharmacological comparison of enzyme replacement therapies for the glycolipid storage disorder Fabry disease