Recommendations to enhance rigor and reproducibility in biomedical research
Author(s) -
Jaqueline Brito,
Jun Z. Li,
Jason H. Moore,
Casey S. Greene,
Nicole Nogoy,
Lana X. Garmire,
Serghei Mangul
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
gigascience
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.947
H-Index - 54
ISSN - 2047-217X
DOI - 10.1093/gigascience/giaa056
Subject(s) - documentation , transparency (behavior) , open science , computer science , rigour , usability , software , data science , software engineering , protocol (science) , engineering ethics , engineering , medicine , human–computer interaction , computer security , physics , geometry , programming language , mathematics , alternative medicine , pathology , astronomy
Biomedical research depends increasingly on computational tools, but mechanisms ensuring open data, open software, and reproducibility are variably enforced by academic institutions, funders, and publishers. Publications may present software for which source code or documentation are or become unavailable; this compromises the role of peer review in evaluating technical strength and scientific contribution. Incomplete ancillary information for an academic software package may bias or limit subsequent work. We provide 8 recommendations to improve reproducibility, transparency, and rigor in computational biology-precisely the values that should be emphasized in life science curricula. Our recommendations for improving software availability, usability, and archival stability aim to foster a sustainable data science ecosystem in life science research.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom