z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Documenting the Need for Patient-Centered Relevant Outcomes in Adult Day Services
Author(s) -
Jonelle Boafo,
Keith A. Anderson,
Abraham A. Brody,
Tina Sadarangani
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
innovation in aging
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2399-5300
DOI - 10.1093/geroni/igab046.322
Subject(s) - psychological intervention , data collection , scale (ratio) , independence (probability theory) , medicine , psychology , medical education , nursing , geography , statistics , cartography , mathematics
ADCs are not uniformly regulated at the federal or state level, resulting in the absence of uniform data collection. The lack of large-scale data has resulted in a dearth of evidence on the role ADC services play in the health and well-being of their clients, particularly persons living with dementia (PLWD). The purpose of this study was to compare data being collected across states and evaluate the degree to which patient centered relevant outcomes (PCROs) are being collected. A review of ADC regulations in 50 states found that <10 states, required standardized reporting on ADC participants. Regulatory forms relied on clinical judgment as opposed to validated tools, and focused on eligibility for services as opposed to independence, engagement, or clinical interventions in the ADC. Emphasizing collection of PCROs in ADCs, beginning at the state level, is an essential step in documenting the value and effectiveness of ADCs, particularly for PLWD.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom