English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Quality is defined in multiple ways and by different stakeholders (e.g., residents, regulators, informed observers). Using a two-stage stratified sampling strategy, we collected data from N=241 residents living in 31 assisted living and residential care communities (AL/RC) in Oregon. Residents rated their overall satisfaction and satisfaction with the AL/RC as a place to live and to receive care. Each interviewer completed a facility profile summarizing their observations about the setting, including quality of staff-resident interactions and physical environment. Residents and interviewers were also asked whether they would recommend the community to others. Finally, we used deficiency citations given during regular inspections by the licensing agency to proxy regulatory perspective. Results show that perceived quality varied by stakeholder (e.g., residents’ assessments differed from deficiency citations). Given this variation, findings suggest that efforts to make quality indicators publicly available should include multiple measures and perspectives, especially residents.

Quality in Assisted Living: Does It Lie in the Eyes of the Beholder?