Trends in Health Expectancies by Late-Life Disadvantage: The Cognitive Function and Ageing Studies
Author(s) -
Holly Bennett,
Andrew Kingston,
Gemma Spiers,
Louise Robinson,
Clare Bambra,
Carol Brayne,
Fiona E. Matthews,
Carol Jagger
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
innovation in aging
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2399-5300
DOI - 10.1093/geroni/igaa057.2197
Subject(s) - disadvantaged , life expectancy , disadvantage , ageing , gerontology , socioeconomic status , demography , cognition , longitudinal study , psychology , medicine , psychiatry , sociology , political science , population , law , pathology
To understand how and why disability-free life expectancy (DFLE) trends differ by socioeconomic position (SEP) we use longitudinal data from the Cognitive Function and Ageing Studies (CFAS I: 1991; CFAS II: 2011), with two year follow up. Disability was defined as difficulty in activities of daily living, and SEP as area-level deprivation. Between 1991 and 2011, men aged 65 gained more in life expectancy (LE) than DFLE, with the greatest gain in DFLE for the most advantaged and in disability years for the most disadvantaged. The most advantaged men experienced a 60% reduction in the risk of death when disability-free, 30% reduction in incident disability, and 80% increase in recovery. The most disadvantaged experienced a 30% reduction of death but from disability. Women overall, and in the most advantaged groups, gained similar years of LE and DFLE to men but due to a 30% reduction in incident disability only.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom