English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Morph frequencies of three related polymorphisms were determined in ten natural populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. They are the well-known inversion polymorphism of the third chromosome and the polymorphism for a-amylase produced by the structural gene Amy (which resides on the third chromosome). The third polymorphism was for tissue-specific expression of Amy in adult midguts; a total of 13 different patterns of activity have been observed. The preceding paper (POWELL and LICHTENFELS 1979) reports evidence that the variation in Amy expression is under polygenic control. Here we show that the polymorphism for midgut activity patterns occurs in natural populations and is not an artifact of laboratory rearing.—From population to population, Amy allele freuencies and frequencies of inversions belonging to different phylads vary coordinately. The geographic variation in α-amylase midgut activity patterns is uncorrelated with that for the other two types of polymorphisms. Furthermore, no correlation was detected between activity pattern(s) and Amy genotype(s) when both were assayed in the same individual.——These results imply that whatever the evolutionary-ecological forces are that control frequencies of the structural gene variants, they are not the same factors that control the frequencies of polymorphic genetic factors responsible for the tissue-specific expression of the enzyme.

POPULATION GENETICS OF DROSOPHILA AMYLASE. II. GEOGRAPHIC PATTERNS IN D. PSEUDOOBSCURA