z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
POPULATION SIZE AND SELECTION INTENSITY EFFECTS ON LONG-TERM SELECTION RESPONSE IN MICE
Author(s) -
E. J. Eisen
Publication year - 1975
Publication title -
genetics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.792
H-Index - 246
eISSN - 1943-2631
pISSN - 0016-6731
DOI - 10.1093/genetics/79.2.305
Subject(s) - selection (genetic algorithm) , biology , crossbreed , zoology , litter , control line , population , weaning , weight gain , line (geometry) , genetics , body weight , mathematics , demography , ecology , endocrinology , telecommunications , geometry , transmission line , artificial intelligence , sociology , computer science
Long-term response to within full-sib family selection for increased postweaning gain was evaluated in lines having different effective population sizes (Ne) and selection intensities (i). Line designations were I4(4), I8(2), I16(2), M4(4), M8(2) and M16(2), where I and M indicate selection of the top 50% and 25%, respectively; 4, 8 and 16 represent the number of parental pairs per replicate and number of replicates is given in parentheses. Realized within full-sib family heritabilities (hR  2) in the first phase of selection (0-14 generations) were larger in 16-pair lines than in 4- and 8-pair lines. In the second phase of selection (>14 generations), hR  2 declined significantly (P<.01) in all lines, and only the I16 and M16 lines had hR  2 values significantly (P<.01) greater than zero. Realized genetic correlations involving number born, 12-day litter weight, weaning weight and six-week weight tended to decline in the second phase of selection. The I16, M16 and control (C16) replicates were crossed in all combinations at generation 14. Crosses were then selected within litters for high postweaning gain. The hR  2 values in the crossbred lines were all larger than those in the second selection phase for M16-1, M16-2 and I16-1, but not for I16-2. Within each Ne level, total response was significantly (P<.01) less for I lines compared with M lines. Total response increased as Ne increased, within each level of i. Relatively small differences in realized i values among Ne lines could not account for this result. The difference in total response among the Ne lines at a given selection intensity may be due to inbreeding depression and a combination of interactions involving "drift" and selection. By crossing replicates of the M lines with the C16 control, the effects of inbreeding depression were removed. Inbreeding depression and genetic drift, as defined herein, were equally important in accounting for differences among Ne lines in total response.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom