z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
The SAFE-T upper endoscopy tool: a web-based application for the point-of-care evaluation of gastroenterology fellow performance in upper endoscopy
Author(s) -
Navin L. Kumar,
Guillaume Kugener,
Kelly Hathorn,
Molly Perencevich,
Kunal Jajoo,
John R. Saltzman
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
gastroenterology report
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.934
H-Index - 26
eISSN - 2052-0034
pISSN - 2304-1412
DOI - 10.1093/gastro/goaa031
Subject(s) - medicine , endoscopy , summative assessment , colonoscopy , upper endoscopy , formative assessment , medical physics , gastroenterology , surgery , general surgery , colorectal cancer , statistics , mathematics , cancer
Background Attending assessment is a critical part of endoscopic education for gastroenterology fellows. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a concise, web-based assessment tool to evaluate real-time fellow performance in upper endoscopy. Methods We developed the Skill Assessment in Fellow Endoscopy Training (SAFE-T) upper endoscopy tool to capture both summative and formative feedback in a concise, five-part questionnaire. The tool mirrors the previously validated SAFE-T colonoscopy tool and is administered electronically via a web-based application. We evaluated the tool in a prospective study of 15 gastroenterology fellows (5 fellows each from Years 1–3 of training) over the 2018–2019 academic year. An independent reviewer evaluated a subset of these procedures and completed both the SAFE-T and Assessment of Competency in Endoscopy (ACE) upper endoscopy forms for reliability testing. Results Twenty faculty completed 413 SAFE-T evaluations of the 15 fellows in the study. The mean SAFE-T overall score differentiated each sequential fellow year of training, with first-year cases having lower performance than second-year cases (3.31 vs 4.25, P  <   0.001) and second-year cases having lower performance than third-year cases (4.25 vs 4.56, P  <   0.001). The mean SAFE-T overall score decreased with increasing case-complexity score, with straightforward compared with average cases (3.98 vs 3.39, P  <   0.001) and average compared with challenging cases (3.39 vs 2.84, P  =   0.042). In dual-observed procedures, the SAFE-T tool showed excellent inter-rater reliability with a Kappa agreement statistic of 0.815 ( P  =   0.001). The SAFE-T overall score also highly correlated with the ACE upper endoscopy overall hands-on score ( r  =   0.76, P  =   0.011). Conclusions We developed and validated the SAFE-T upper endoscopy tool—a concise and web-based means of assessing real-time gastroenterology fellow performance in upper endoscopy.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom