An Alternative to Traditional Goodness-of-Fit Tests for Discretely Measured Continuous Data
Author(s) -
KaDonna C. Randolph,
Bill L. Seaver
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
forest science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.447
H-Index - 77
eISSN - 1938-3738
pISSN - 0015-749X
DOI - 10.1093/forestscience/53.5.590
Subject(s) - goodness of fit , percentile , statistics , mathematics , contingency table , confidence interval , kolmogorov–smirnov test , loblolly pine , statistical hypothesis testing , pinus <genus> , botany , biology
Traditional goodness-of-fit tests such as the Kolmogorov-Smirnov and 2 tests are easily applied to data of the continuous or discrete type, respectively. Occasionally, however, the case arises when continuous data are recorded into discrete categories due to an imprecise measurement system. In this instance, the traditional goodness-of-fit tests may not be wholly applicable because of an unmanageable number of ties in the data, sparse contingency tables, or both; therefore, a flexible alternative to goodness-of-fit tests for discretely measured continuous data is presented. The proposed methodology bootstraps confidence intervals for the difference between selected percentiles of the empirical distribution functions of two samples. Application of the approach is illustrated with a comparison of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) tree crown density distributions at the 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, and 90th percentiles simultaneously. FOR .S CI. 53(5):590 -599.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom