z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Using auxiliary data to rationalize smartphone-based pre-harvest forest mensuration
Author(s) -
Timo P. Pitkänen,
Minna Räty,
Pekka Hyvönen,
Kari Korhonen,
Jari Vauhkonen
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
forestry an international journal of forest research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.747
H-Index - 63
eISSN - 1464-3626
pISSN - 0015-752X
DOI - 10.1093/forestry/cpab039
Subject(s) - sampling (signal processing) , sample (material) , variance (accounting) , computer science , forest inventory , simple random sample , statistics , data mining , random forest , sampling design , sample size determination , variable (mathematics) , mathematics , forest management , geography , forestry , artificial intelligence , accounting , population , chemistry , demography , filter (signal processing) , chromatography , sociology , business , mathematical analysis , computer vision
Accurate mensuration of forest stands for pre-harvest planning will pose high costs if carried out by a professional forester as an on-site evaluation. The costs could be reduced if a person with limited mensuration expertise could collect the required data using a smartphone-based system such as TRESTIMA® Forest Inventory System. Without prior information, the field sample with sufficient number of measurement points over the whole stand should be selected, so that the entire variation will be covered. We present and test a rational framework based on selecting the sampling locations according to auxiliary data. As auxiliary variables, we use various spatial data sources indicating forests’ structural or spectral variation, as well as previously predicted inventory variables. We construct two variants of sampling schemes based on the local pivotal method, weighted by the auxiliary data, and compare the results to simple random sampling (SRS) with corresponding sample sizes. According to our findings, the benefits of auxiliary data depend on the considered stand, species and timber assortment. The use of auxiliary data leads generally to improved results and up to three times higher efficiency (i.e. lower variance) as compared with SRS. We conclude that the framework of applying auxiliary data has high capabilities in rationalizing the sampling efforts with little drawbacks, consequently providing potential to improve the results with similar sample size and possibility to use of non-specialists for the pre-harvest inventory.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom