z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Restoration of landscape function: reserves or active management?
Author(s) -
Andrew B. Carey
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
forestry an international journal of forest research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.747
H-Index - 63
eISSN - 1464-3626
pISSN - 0015-752X
DOI - 10.1093/forestry/76.2.221
Subject(s) - forest restoration , sustainability , riparian zone , wildlife , biodiversity , geography , old growth forest , forest management , environmental resource management , riparian forest , ecology , agroforestry , forest ecology , ecosystem , forestry , environmental science , habitat , biology
Summary A 20-year programme of research suggests that old-growth forests are ecologically unique and highly valued by people, that naturally young forests with legacies from old forests sustain many, if not all, the higher organisms associated with old growth, but that many managed forests are impoverished in species. Thus, restoring landscape function entails restoring function to managed stands. Managing processes of forest development, not just providing selected structures, is necessary to restore function and biodiversity. Systems of reserves and riparian corridors that do not take into account ecological restoration of managed forests and degraded streams may be self-fulfilling prophecies of forest fragmentation and landscape dysfunction. Intentional management can reduce the need for wide riparian buffers, produce landscapes dominated by late-seral stages that are hospitable to wildlife associated with old-growth forests, provide a sustained yield of forest products and contribute to economic, social and environmental sustainability.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom