Innovative data analysis approach informing policy action to improve wellbeing and health equity
Author(s) -
James Allen,
Lu Yang,
M Dyakova,
Rajendra Kadel,
G. Lance Couzens,
M Van Eimeren,
Rebecca J. Hill
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
european journal of public health
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.056
H-Index - 91
eISSN - 1464-360X
pISSN - 1101-1262
DOI - 10.1093/eurpub/ckaa166.284
Subject(s) - health equity , social determinants of health , health policy , mental health , equity (law) , population health , public economics , population , economic growth , demographic economics , psychology , environmental health , business , political science , medicine , health care , economics , psychiatry , law
Wales is leading the way as one of the first countries supporting the World Health Organization to take forward the work of the Health Equity Status Report Initiative (HESRi) at a national level. The Welsh Health Equity Status Report Initiative (WHESRi) has been established to strengthen this global wellbeing and health equity agenda, applying a cutting-edge HESRi methodology first in Wales, providing valuable lessons and experience, which can enable other countries to take action to address health inequity. WHESRi includes three research streams: a) Health equity data analysis; b) Policy analysis and c) Health economic analysis. The National Survey for Wales (NSW) (cross-sectional study design) is used to 'decompose' the gap in a health outcome using the Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition methodology. The analysis breaks down contributions to the inequitable health outcomes observed between different population groups, by factors that differ systematically between the groups. Factors, which align to the five HESRi health equity conditions (Health Services, Income Security & Social Protection, Living Conditions, Social & Human Capital and Employment & Working Conditions). The work is also exploring how different health outcomes e.g. mental health and life satisfaction, result in different relative contributions to inequities in those outcomes from the five conditions. Analysis of the 2016-17 NSW shows that the prevalence of good health is significantly higher in those who are not materially deprived (75.6% CI 74.5% to 76.6%) compared to those who are (55.3% CI 52.3% to 58.4%). Preliminary data suggests that when decomposing the gap in self-reported health between those who are materially deprived and those who are not, the largest contributing factor to the inequity is systematic differences in the degree of Income Security and Social Protection (39%). The analysis identifies priority policy areas for action and further analysis. Key messages The health gap can be stratified and explained by five essential health equity conditions. Explaining the health gap informs cross-sector policy action and investment prioritisation towards healthy prosperous lives for all.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom