Apical vs. non-apical right ventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy: a meta-analysis
Author(s) -
Theodoros Zografos,
Konstantinos C. Siontis,
Marek Jastrzębski,
Valentina Kutyifa,
Helmut Klein,
Wojciech Zaręba,
Demosthenes G. Katritsis
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
ep europace
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.119
H-Index - 102
eISSN - 1532-2092
pISSN - 1099-5129
DOI - 10.1093/europace/euv048
Subject(s) - medicine , cardiac resynchronization therapy , cardiology , meta analysis , heart failure , observational study , ventricular pacing , randomized controlled trial , ventricular dyssynchrony , ejection fraction
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been shown to improve outcomes in patients with heart failure. The optimal site of right ventricular (RV) stimulation in CRT has not been established. We aimed to conduct a meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials and observational studies comparing the mid- and long-term effects of RV apical (RVA) and non-apical (RVNA) pacing on CRT outcomes.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom