Ablation of typical atrial flutter using a non-fluoroscopic catheter tracking system vs. conventional fluoroscopy—results from a prospective randomized study | Zendy

Katharina Schoene | Zendy; Sascha Rolf | Zendy; Denis Schloma | Zendy; Silke John | Zendy; Arash Arya | Zendy; Borislav Dinov | Zendy; Sergio Richter | Zendy; Andreas Bollmann | Zendy; Gerhard Hindricks | Zendy; Philipp Sommer | Zendy

Open Access

Ablation of typical atrial flutter using a non-fluoroscopic catheter tracking system vs. conventional fluoroscopy—results from a prospective randomized study

Author(s) -

Katharina Schoene,

Sascha Rolf,

Denis Schloma,

Silke John,

Arash Arya,

Borislav Dinov,

Sergio Richter,

Andreas Bollmann,

Gerhard Hindricks,

Philipp Sommer

Publication year - 2015

Publication title -

ep europace

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 2.119

H-Index - 102

eISSN - 1532-2092

pISSN - 1099-5129

DOI - 10.1093/europace/euu398

Subject(s) - medicine , fluoroscopy , atrial flutter , ablation , catheter , catheter ablation , radiology , tracking (education) , cardiology , psychology , pedagogy

Reduction of radiation exposure using a sensor-based non-fluoroscopic catheter tracking (NFCT) system (MediGuide™, St Jude Medical, Inc.) was recently demonstrated by retrospective comparisons. We aimed to prospectively compare the effects of using NFCT vs. standard fluoroscopy on procedural parameters in patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation of typical atrial flutter.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom

About

About Careers Publisher Partners Contact Us Our institutional solutions Get Organisational Trial or Quote

Learn

FAQs Blog Terms of Use Privacy Policy

Download the Zendy App

Discover

Explore

Home ZAIA Blog