Health economic evaluation of single-lead atrial pacing vs. dual-chamber pacing in sick sinus syndrome | Zendy

Lars Oddershede | Zendy; Sam Riahi | Zendy; Jens Cosedis Nielsen | Zendy; Søren Hjortshøj | Zendy; Henning Andersen | Zendy; Lars Holger Ehlers | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Health economic evaluation of single-lead atrial pacing vs. dual-chamber pacing in sick sinus syndrome

Author(s) -

Lars Oddershede,

Sam Riahi,

Jens Cosedis Nielsen,

Søren Hjortshøj,

Henning Andersen,

Lars Holger Ehlers

Publication year - 2014

Publication title -

ep europace

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 2.119

H-Index - 102

eISSN - 1532-2092

pISSN - 1099-5129

DOI - 10.1093/europace/eut384

Subject(s) - medicine , sick sinus syndrome , randomized controlled trial , danish , sick leave , clinical trial , confidence interval , emergency medicine , physical therapy , philosophy , linguistics

The recent Danish Multicentre Randomized Trial on Single-Lead Atrial (AAIR) Pacing versus Dual-Chamber (DDDR) Pacing in Sick Sinus Syndrome (DANPACE) suggested DDDR pacing as standard care. However, previous findings supported the routine use of AAIR pacing. This study investigated the cost-effectiveness of DDDR pacing compared with AAIR pacing for sick sinus syndrome.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research