z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Attitude towards redundant leads and the practice of lead extractions: a European survey
Author(s) -
Lieselot van Erven,
James M. Morgan
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
ep europace
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.119
H-Index - 102
eISSN - 1532-2092
pISSN - 1099-5129
DOI - 10.1093/europace/eup443
Subject(s) - medicine , lead (geology) , perception , clinical practice , physical therapy , neuroscience , biology , geomorphology , geology
This survey has compared attitudes towards (endocardial) lead extraction, among European electrophysiology centres, with special attention paid to 'redundant leads'. The main findings of this survey are: (i) most of the centres performing lead extractions do so in low volume even though the number of implants may be high. (ii) Approaches to the practice of lead extraction are based largely on clinical experience and individual sentiment but not on a rigorous evidence based. (iii) Traction alone or in combination with extraction tools (but not laser) are commonly used for extraction. (iv) The perception of need for involvement of cardio-thoracic surgeon varies.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom