z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Performance and survival of transvenous defibrillation leads: need for a European data registry
Author(s) -
Andreas Goette,
Francesco Cantù,
Lieselot van Erven,
P. Geelen,
Franck Halimi,
José Luís Merino,
James M. Morgan
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
ep europace
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.119
H-Index - 102
eISSN - 1532-2092
pISSN - 1099-5129
DOI - 10.1093/europace/eun301
Subject(s) - medicine , defibrillation , incidence (geometry) , cardiac resynchronization therapy , intensive care medicine , implantable cardioverter defibrillator , pace , heart failure , emergency medicine , pediatrics , medical emergency , ejection fraction , physics , geodesy , optics , geography
Although the use of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy has increased over the last decades, the reporting of ICD lead performance is inadequate. So far, there is neither a European nor worldwide registry on ICD leads. The published long-term results from national or multicentre registries encompass relatively small patient cohorts. Nevertheless, the failure of ICD leads may have substantial clinical consequences, including failure to sense, failure to pace, failure to defibrillate, inappropriate shocks, and even death of the patient. The reported ICD lead survival varies significantly between studies: 91-99% at 2 years, 85-95% at 5 years, and 60-72% at 8 years. Thus, the true incidence of lead malfunction cannot be defined as outlined in the present review. One current initiative of the European Heart Rhythm Association is to initiate and develop a Europe-wide registry to monitor, over a prolonged follow-up period, the performance of ICDs and ICD leads.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom