Dual-chamber defibrillators reduce clinically significant adverse events compared with single-chamber devices: results from the DATAS (Dual chamber and Atrial Tachyarrhythmias Adverse events Study) trial
Author(s) -
Jesús Almendral,
Fernando Arribas,
Christian Wolpert,
Renato Pietro Ricci,
Pedro Adragão,
Erik Cobo,
Xavier Navarro,
Aurelio Quesada
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
ep europace
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.119
H-Index - 102
eISSN - 1532-2092
pISSN - 1099-5129
DOI - 10.1093/europace/eun072
Subject(s) - medicine , implantable cardioverter defibrillator , single chamber , cardiology , adverse effect , ejection fraction , clinical endpoint , randomized controlled trial , artificial cardiac pacemaker , heart failure
This randomized trial evaluated clinically significant adverse events (CSAEs), in patients implanted with dual-chamber (DC) vs. single-chamber (SC) implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). DC-ICD had atrial tachyarrhythmia (AT) therapy capabilities. Strict programming recommendations were reinforced.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom