Evaluation of early percutaneous coronary intervention vs. standard therapy after fibrinolysis for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: contribution of weighting the composite endpoint | Zendy

Jeffrey A. Bakal | Zendy; Cynthia M. Westerhout | Zendy; Warren J. Cantor | Zendy; Francisco FernándezAvilés | Zendy; Robert C. Welsh | Zendy; D. Fitchett | Zendy; Shaun G. Goodman | Zendy; Paul W. Armstrong | Zendy

Open Access

Evaluation of early percutaneous coronary intervention vs. standard therapy after fibrinolysis for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: contribution of weighting the composite endpoint

Author(s) -

Jeffrey A. Bakal,

Cynthia M. Westerhout,

Warren J. Cantor,

Francisco FernándezAvilés,

Robert C. Welsh,

D. Fitchett,

Shaun G. Goodman,

Paul W. Armstrong

Publication year - 2012

Publication title -

european heart journal

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 4.336

H-Index - 293

eISSN - 1522-9645

pISSN - 0195-668X

DOI - 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs438

Subject(s) - medicine , percutaneous coronary intervention , fibrinolysis , cardiology , myocardial infarction , st segment

The selection of optimal endpoints for cardiovascular clinical trials continues to be challenging. We examined an alternative interpretation of a series of trials when the individual event severity is considered.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research