z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Routine Screening for Chronic Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection: Why Don't the Guidelines Agree?
Author(s) -
Roger Chou
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
epidemiologic reviews
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.253
H-Index - 106
eISSN - 1478-6729
pISSN - 0193-936X
DOI - 10.1093/epirev/mxr001
Subject(s) - medicine , guideline , human immunodeficiency virus (hiv) , public health , task force , confusion , disease control , family medicine , environmental health , pathology , psychology , public administration , political science , psychoanalysis
Infection with human immunodeficiency virus remains a major public health problem in the United States. Prominent guidelines from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention differ in their recommendations on whether and how to screen adults and adolescents not known to be at higher risk. These discrepancies have led to controversy and debate as well as confusion among clinicians. This article reviews principles of screening, explains specific issues related to screening for human immunodeficiency virus, reviews the discrepancies between the US Preventive Services Task Force and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines and the methods used in each guideline, and describes potential reasons for the discrepancies. The case of screening for human immunodeficiency virus illustrates how discrepancies between guidelines may be related to different guideline development methods as well as the different perspectives of the guideline development groups.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom