English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Historically students of craniology believed, erroneously, that only the active processes of surface deposition and resorption and of interstitial expansion were involved in skull growth. The introduction of the method of functional cranial analysis placed primary emphasis on the morphogenetic role of the functional matrix. The two principal types of functional matrices, the periosteal and the capsular, are defined. The former alter the size and shape of the skeletal tissues while the latter alter spatial position. The majority of facial skeletal growth is shown to be due to the passive translation of the skeletal tissues within the orofacial capsule, responding to the prior and primary volumetric expansion of the oro-nasopharyngeal functioning spaces, acting as capsular matrices.

The differential roles of periosteal and capsular functional matrices in orofacial growth