z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Comparative shear bond strength of some orthodontic bonding resins to enamel
Author(s) -
Luc Trimpeneers,
R. M. H. Verbeeck,
Luc Dermaut,
M. Moors
Publication year - 1996
Publication title -
european journal of orthodontics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.252
H-Index - 84
eISSN - 1460-2210
pISSN - 0141-5387
DOI - 10.1093/ejo/18.1.89
Subject(s) - enamel paint , materials science , bond strength , dental bonding , composite material , bond , shear strength (soil) , dentistry , orthodontics , geology , adhesive , medicine , business , layer (electronics) , soil science , soil water , finance
The aim of this study was to compare the in vitro bond strength, to bovine enamel measured in shear, of the orthodontic adhesives Lee Insta-bond (LiB), Rely-a-Bond (RaB), Right-on (Ro), Concise precoating method (Cc), Concise mixed method (CaB), Super-C (Sc), and Orthon (Or), and of the glass ionomer cement Ketac-Cem (KC). The fracture surfaces after debonding were also examined in order to determine the sites of failure. The results indicate that there is a significant difference between the shear bond strength obtained with the different adhesives so that the mean shear bond strength decreases in the order [Ro approximately Cab approximately Sc] > [LiB approximately RaB approximately Cc] > Or > KC. Moreover, for Cab and Sc it was found that the shear bond strength varies depending on the location on the bovine tooth. The failure site was essentially at the resin-bracket interface, except for Concise, where only 50 per cent of the cases failed at the resin-bracket interface.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom