Comparative shear bond strength of some orthodontic bonding resins to enamel
Author(s) -
Luc Trimpeneers,
R. M. H. Verbeeck,
Luc Dermaut,
M. Moors
Publication year - 1996
Publication title -
european journal of orthodontics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.252
H-Index - 84
eISSN - 1460-2210
pISSN - 0141-5387
DOI - 10.1093/ejo/18.1.89
Subject(s) - enamel paint , materials science , bond strength , dental bonding , composite material , bond , shear strength (soil) , dentistry , orthodontics , geology , adhesive , medicine , business , layer (electronics) , soil science , soil water , finance
The aim of this study was to compare the in vitro bond strength, to bovine enamel measured in shear, of the orthodontic adhesives Lee Insta-bond (LiB), Rely-a-Bond (RaB), Right-on (Ro), Concise precoating method (Cc), Concise mixed method (CaB), Super-C (Sc), and Orthon (Or), and of the glass ionomer cement Ketac-Cem (KC). The fracture surfaces after debonding were also examined in order to determine the sites of failure. The results indicate that there is a significant difference between the shear bond strength obtained with the different adhesives so that the mean shear bond strength decreases in the order [Ro approximately Cab approximately Sc] > [LiB approximately RaB approximately Cc] > Or > KC. Moreover, for Cab and Sc it was found that the shear bond strength varies depending on the location on the bovine tooth. The failure site was essentially at the resin-bracket interface, except for Concise, where only 50 per cent of the cases failed at the resin-bracket interface.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom