National Courts, Domestic Democracy, and the Evolution of International Law: A Reply to Eyal Benvenisti and George Downs | Zendy

Nikolaos Lavranos | Zendy

Open Access

National Courts, Domestic Democracy, and the Evolution of International Law: A Reply to Eyal Benvenisti and George Downs

Author(s) -

Nikolaos Lavranos

Publication year - 2009

Publication title -

european journal of international law

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 0.607

H-Index - 59

eISSN - 1464-3596

pISSN - 0938-5428

DOI - 10.1093/ejil/chp097

Subject(s) - law , international law , democracy , hierarchy , political science , position (finance) , sociology , international court , george (robot) , power (physics) , politics , public international law , economics , history , physics , finance , quantum mechanics , art history

This reply to Benvinisti/Downs' article argues that instead of thinking of a grand overarching theory on the interjudicial cooperation between international courts and domestic courts, it is more appropriate to develop a regime-based analytical framework. Only in this way, is it possible to take the specific characteristics and configurations into account.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research