English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The conceptual framework which they have constructed for this purpose is grounded in the notion of acculturation, a well-established social process whose dynamics in the international legal context has been examined by the two authors in a multi-step fashion, featuring a progression from general model-building to elaborate responses to specifi c issues raised by critics. Their latest contribution on the subject falls predominantly into the latter category. It is entitled ‘ Incomplete Internationalization and Compliance with Human Rights Law ’ and has been recently published in the European Journal of International Law . 2 Goodman and Jinks differentiate between coercion-based and persuasion-based mechanisms for promoting adherence to social norms, including human rights law. The former entail pressure on recalcitrant actors to follow a desired/virtuous path and the latter connote resort to conviction in an effort to instil a belief in the intrinsic value of the relevant norms and their appropriateness. These parallel processes of social infl uence are observed in the international arena and are assumed to have

Incomplete Internalization and Compliance with Human Rights Law: A Reply to Ryan Goodman and Derek Jinks