z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Does Article 3 of The European Convention on Human Rights Enshrine Absolute Rights?
Author(s) -
Michael K. Addo,
Nicholas Grief
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
european journal of international law
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.607
H-Index - 59
eISSN - 1464-3596
pISSN - 0938-5428
DOI - 10.1093/ejil/9.3.510
Subject(s) - absolute (philosophy) , convention , human rights , torture , context (archaeology) , law , political science , international human rights law , right to property , fundamental rights , law and economics , sociology , epistemology , philosophy , history , archaeology
Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which prohibits torture and other forms of ill-treatment, does not expressly provide that its terms are absolute. Nevertheless, the idea that Article 3 contains absolute rights is generally accepted. This article explores the concept of absolute rights in Article 3, both with reference to theoretical considerations and in the light of Strasbourg case law. It concludes that the notion of absolute rights is nebulous because it involves an assessment of subjective factors and that it is best understood within the wider context of the Convention as a whole.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom