English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In recent critically inclined texts on human rights, we find a desire to acknowledge the cultural specificity of the human rights regime, to consider the colonial origins of international law and to take account of the putative axiom of globalization. This trilogy is often accompanied by an asserted faith (however vestigial) in the human rights regime. In this essay, the author explores the paradox of such a convergence, asking whether such texts (and the one at hand in particular) are unintentionally performing the question which marks the zeitgeist - that is whether human rights law can ever be anything other than imperializing. To the extent that any sensitization of human rights to its history and context involves a project of 'refounding' them - no matter how 'diverse' the foundation - it would seem that the answer is no. Arguably such projects remain ensnared in the modern oscillation between the myth of universality on one hand and the nihilism of cultural relativism on the other, ironically forgoing consideration of the relationality of being implied by that very oscillation.

european journal of international law

'This is the World: Have Faith': Shelley Wright, International Human Rights, Decolonisation and Globalisation: Becoming Human. London and New York: Routledge, 2001.