z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
State Responsibility v. Individual Responsibility for International Crimes: Tertium Non Datur?
Author(s) -
Marina Spinedi
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
european journal of international law
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.607
H-Index - 59
eISSN - 1464-3596
pISSN - 0938-5428
DOI - 10.1093/ejil/13.4.895
Subject(s) - crimes against humanity , state (computer science) , jurisdiction , state responsibility , law , conflict of laws , criminal responsibility , political science , humanity , international law , war crime , sociology , criminal law , algorithm , computer science
The ICJ held in the recent Congo v. Belgium case that a former Minister for Foreign Affairs of a state may be subjected to the criminal jurisdiction of another state only in respect of acts carried out 'in a private capacity'. Therefore the question arises of whether international crimes committed by persons with the status of state officials are to be regarded as acts done 'in a private capacity'. This article argues that the answer to this question should be in the negative. Treating war crimes or crimes against humanity perpetrated by a state official as acts committed 'in a private capacity' would mean that such acts could not be attributed to the state at an international level. As a consequence, the state would not be responsible for those acts under international law.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom