Which T descriptor is more predictive of recurrence after sublobar resection: whole tumour size versus solid component size? | Zendy

Hang Su | Zendy; Chenyang Dai | Zendy; Yunlang She | Zendy; Yijiu Ren | Zendy; Lei Zhang | Zendy; Huikang Xie | Zendy; Dong Xie | Zendy; Gening Jiang | Zendy; Chang Chen | Zendy

Open Access

Which T descriptor is more predictive of recurrence after sublobar resection: whole tumour size versus solid component size?

Author(s) -

Hang Su,

Chenyang Dai,

Yunlang She,

Yijiu Ren,

Lei Zhang,

Huikang Xie,

Dong Xie,

Gening Jiang,

Chang Chen

Publication year - 2018

Publication title -

european journal of cardio-thoracic surgery

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 1.303

H-Index - 133

eISSN - 1873-734X

pISSN - 1010-7940

DOI - 10.1093/ejcts/ezy225

Subject(s) - hazard ratio , medicine , receiver operating characteristic , adenocarcinoma , confidence interval , proportional hazards model , pathological , stage (stratigraphy) , radiology , ground glass opacity , nodule (geology) , predictive value of tests , nuclear medicine , cancer , biology , paleontology

We aimed to assess the predictive value of different T descriptors, including the whole tumour size (Dwhole) and solid component size (Dsolid), in patients with clinical Stage IA adenocarcinoma who underwent sublobar resection.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research